Sources of XM Problems
Common XM Opening Problems
ModPlug Player is Not Installed
You encounter an error message such as "%%os%% Can't Open XM Files" when trying to open your XM. When this happens, it is commonly due to ModPlug Player missing in %%os%%. Your operating system cannot associate your XM with ModPlug Player, so double-clicking the file won't work.
Tip: If you know of another program that can open your XM file, you can try opening it by selecting the application from the programs listed.
Incorrect ModPlug Player Version
In some cases, you might have a newer (or older) version of a FastTracker 2 Extended Module file that is unsupported by your installed application version. Download the latest ModPlug Player version from the Open Source website to ensure you have the correct one installed. Most of the time your FastTracker 2 Extended Module file was created by a newer ModPlug Player than what you have installed.
Tip: You can sometimes get hints about the right program version by right-clicking on the XM file, selecting "Properties", and looking at the version information.
Conclusion: The majority of XM file opening issues are due to not having the correct ModPlug Player version installed.
Additional XM Opening Issues
Assuming you have the right ModPlug Player version installed, other problems can prevent you from opening XM files. There can be other issues - unrelated to software - preventing you from opening XM files. Issues that aren't software-related:
- Windows Registry XM file paths that are incorrect
- Corruption of the XM file description inside the Registry
- Corrupt install of ModPlug Player or other XM-related program
- Your XM file is corrupted (issues with your FastTracker 2 Extended Module file itself)
- XM file integrity has been compromised by malware
- Hardware related to XMs has device driver corruption
- Windows cannot load your FastTracker 2 Extended Module file due to insufficient resources (eg. RAM)
Quiz: Which image file type is the most popular format used on websites?
That's Correct!
PNGs are just slightly more popular than JPEG files (74.5% vs. 72.8% of websites using them) according to usage data from W3Techs.com.
Close, but not quite...
PNGs are just slightly more popular than JPEG files (74.5% vs. 72.8% of websites using them) according to usage data from W3Techs.com.
Poll: How often do you encounter a file extension that you don't recognize?